General, General Test, Online Test MOCK TEST 21 JUDICIAL SERVICE EXAM 2021 4 All The Best Thank you for visit ! share with friends. JUDICIAL SERVICE EXAM MOCK TEST 21 1 / 25 25. A contracts to pay B a sum of Rs . 20,000 if B's house is burnt . This is 1. A. contract of wager 2. B. contingent contract 3. C. contract of uncertainty 4. D. None of the above 2 / 25 24. An agreement in restraint of marriage is 1. A. valid 2. B. void 3. C. voidable 4. D. totally unacceptable 3 / 25 23. An agreement is vold 1. A. if the consideration is unlawful in part 2. B. if the consideration is not provided by the parties 3. C. if the consideration is to be given in future 4. D. if the consideration is paid in the past 4 / 25 22. When consent to an agreement is caused by coercion , the agreement is 1. A. valid contract 2. B. voidable contract 3. C. void contract 4. D. invalid contract · 5 / 25 21. Two or more persons are said to consent when 1. A. they agree 2. B. they agree upon the same thing 3. C. they agree upon the same thing in the same sense 4. D. they agree upon the same thing in the same sense at the given location 6 / 25 20. " Consent ' is said to be free when it is caused by 1. A. coercion of the will of the parties 2. B. fraud 3. C. mistake 4. D. voluntary will of the parties 7 / 25 19. Who is competent to contract ? 1. A. Person of unsound mind 2. B. Person who has not attained majority 3. C. Person who has been disqualified from contracting by the Court 4. D. Person who has been debarred from contesting any elections 8 / 25 18. The acceptance must be 1. A. received within a week 2. B. received within a fortnight 3. C. absolute and unqualified 4. D. absolute and qualified 9 / 25 17. Which statement is not true ? 1. A. A proposal is revoked by the communication of notice of revocation by the proposer to the other party . 2. B. A proposal is revoked by the lapse of time prescribed in such proposal for its acceptance . 3. C. A proposal is revoked by the lapse of reasonable time , if no time is prescribed . 4. D. A proposal is revoked by not meeting at the time prescribed 10 / 25 16. The communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the 1. A. hands of the person to whom it is made 2. B. knowledge of the person to whom it is made 3. C. office of the person to whom it is made 4. D. residence of the person to whom it is made 11 / 25 15. An agreement not enforceable by law is 1. A. valid 2. B. invalid 3. C. void 4. D. voidable 12 / 25 14. Offer ' or ' Proposal ' is defined in Indian Contract Act in 1. A. Section 2 ( a ) 2. B. Section 2 ( d ) 3. C. Section 2 ( b ) 4. D. Section 2 ( e ) 13 / 25 13. Under which Section of Cr.P.C. , a person who is avoiding execution of a warrant may be proclaimed absconder ? 1. A. Section 81 2. B. Section 82 3. C. Section 83 4. D. Section 84 14 / 25 12. Which one of the following cases refers to ' Conspiracy ' under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act ? 1. A. Pulukuri Kottaya v . Emperor 2. B. Biswanath Prasad v . Dwarka Prasad , 3. C. Jayantibhai Bhenkarbhai v . State 4. D. Mohd Khalid v . State of West Bengal , 15 / 25 11. Which one of the following cases pertains to the constitutionality of Section 497 IPC ? 1. A. Joseph Shine v . Union of India , AIR 2018 SC 4321 2. B. Sakshi v . Union of India , AIR 2004 SC 3566 3. C. Common Cause v . Union of India , AIR 2018 SC 4998 4. D. Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar v . Union of India , AIR 2018 SC 4135 16 / 25 10. Which one of the following cases pertains to the constitutionality of Section 377 , IPC ? 1. A. Vishakha v . State of Rajasthan , AIR 1997 SC 3011 2. B. Pratim alias Peter Mukherjee v . Union of India , AIR 2018 Bom 224 3. C. Navtej Singh Johar v . Union of India , AIR 2018 SC 4321 4. D. Jasmeet Kaur v . Navtej Singh , AIR 2018 SC ( Supp . ) 898 17 / 25 9. Which one of the following cases pertains to the misuse of Section 498A , 1PC ? 1. A. Naresh Kumar v . State of Himachal Pradesh , AIR 2017 SC 3859 2. B. Preeti Gupta v . State of Jharkhand , AIR 2010 SC 3363 3. C. Rajendra Paswan v . State of Jharkhand & Others , AIR 2017 Jhar 123 4. D. Zv . State of Bihar , AIR 2017 SC 3908 18 / 25 8. Which one of the following conclusions can be drawn from the maxim ' de minimis nor curat lex ' ? 1. A. Necessity knows no law 2. B. Nothing is an offence done by a child under 7 years of age 3. C. Every person is liable for his own acts 4. D. Trifling acts do not constitute an offence 19 / 25 7. Which one of the following is sufficient to prove the offence of sedition ? 1. A. Comments expressing disapproval of the policies of the Government with a view to obtain a change in policies by lawful means 2. B. Proof of disloyalty or ill feelings 3. C. Comments expressing disapproval of the administrative action even though these do not excite hatred or disloyalty 4. D. Exciting disaffection towards the Government 20 / 25 6. X with a view to murder Y enters Y's bedroom at night when Y is out of station . X is guilty of 1. A. murder 2. B. house - trespass 3. C. attempt to murder 4. D. no offence 21 / 25 5. A having delivered money to his servant to carry to a distant place disguises himself and robs the servant on the highway with an intent to charge him . A commits the offence of 1. A. theft 2. B. extortion 3. C. robbery 4. D. criminal breach of trust 22 / 25 4. If actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea is a cardinal principle of criminal law , then which one of the following statements correctly reflects the above principle ? 1. A. Mens rea is an essential element of a crime and there cannot be a crime without mens rea . 2. B. Criminal liability under Indian law always implies mens rea . 3. C. To constitute a crime , there must be actus reas and mens rea . 4. D. Actus reas is not always necessary to constitute a crime 23 / 25 3. Under which of the following situations would the Indian courts have jurisdiction ? 1. Crime committed by an Indian in a foreign country 2. Crime committed by a foreigner in India 3. Crime committed by a person on an Indian ship Select the correct answer using the codes given below . Codes : 1. A. 1 and 2 2. B. 1 and 3 3. C. 2 only 4. D. 1 , 2 and 3 24 / 25 2. Consider the following statements : 1. A person is not guilty of dacoity unless he has committed , attempted to commit or aided in committing robbery . 2. 2. When two persons conjointly commit robbery , every person so committing robbery is said to commit robbery . Of the above statements 1. A. 1 and 2 are true 2. B. 1 and 2 are false 3. C. 1 is true but 2 is false 4. D. 1 is false but 2 is true . 25 / 25 1. Y picks X's pocket . Next day , X while buying " paan ' near his office finds Y paying money from X's purse . X catches hold of Y and tries to take back his purse . Y resists . X twists Y's arm with such force that it is broken . X is charged with causing hurt to Y. X can 1. A. say that he was acting under right of private defence of property 2. B. not raise the plea of right of private defence since he had time to seek the help of public authorities 3. C. say that his right of private defence was revived as soon as he saw Y with his purse 4. D. say that he did not use more force than was required Your score is The average score is 61% Restart quiz
